Operations software
Orders, jobs, quotes, stock, production planning. Interfaces designed for people who use them eight hours a day.
Services · 03
When a company bends the way it works around a rigid management system, the cost doesn't appear on the invoice. It appears in the hours spent copying data and in the information nobody has updated.
We don't start from the code. We start from the step that today lives in a spreadsheet, and from the person who fills it in every day.
Not always. New software makes sense when the process is already stable and the tool is the problem, not when the process is still being defined.
Orders, jobs, quotes, stock, production planning. Interfaces designed for people who use them eight hours a day.
Private area with documents, job status, payments and requests. It reduces phone calls and makes traceable what today is only spoken.
Numbers that today get rebuilt at the end of the month: margins, lead times, workload, deadlines. Calculated once and always current.
Connections with the management system, accounting, couriers, payments and external services. If a system has no API, we look at alternatives before forcing a compromise.
Internal software is designed by looking at the people who will use it. That is why the first phase doesn't happen in a meeting room: it happens at the workstation.
We observe the process as it runs today and collect the edge cases: the ones that break standard systems, and the ones that rarely make it into a specification.
The main screens before the code, tried out with the people who will use them. Fixing here costs an hour; fixing later costs a week.
The essential features go into use early, the rest follows. Software used from the first week collects feedback no initial analysis predicts.
Updates, backups, monitoring and changes over time, with a direct channel and response times agreed in advance.
It depends on how many processes are involved and on the integrations. A first usable module typically takes a few weeks of work; the proposal is written after the mapping, never before.
Yes, and it is the way we recommend. You start from the process that creates the most friction, put it into use, and measure the time saved. The following features are decided with data in hand.
The code and the data belong to the client, with access to the repository and the ability to export the data in open formats. There is no lock-in that forces you to stay with us in order to keep working.
If the problem is solved by connecting the systems you already have, instead of writing new software.
When you need a public front door to the process, and not only an internal tool.
What changes when the software has to live alongside a craft workshop or a professional practice.
Often it is enough to describe a single repetitive operation to understand whether what pays off is an automation, a software module, or neither.